• Home
    • Workers Comp Audit Stress Reducer – Use It For Your Next Premium Audit
  • About Us
    • Cutting Workers Comp Costs – About Our Company
    • President – Expert James J Moore AIC MBA ChFC ARM
    • OSHA Risk Manager – Glen DuLac – Added To Fulfill Customer Service
  • Work Comp Consultants
  • Free Info
    • Definitions
    • Free Speech
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Free Manuals
  • Six Secrets
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

J&L Risk Management Consultants

Work Comp expert witness reserve reviews premium audits for employers

icons
Call us today! 1-800-813-1386
WORKERS' COMPENSATION PREMIUM REFUNDS POSSIBLE.
Home » Archives for October 2014

Archives for October 2014

Save On Workers Comp Premiums – Keep Your Website Current

October 22, 2014 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Save On Workers Comp Premiums With An Updated Website

Keeping your company’s website up to date is one of the best ways to save on Workers Comp premiums increase your business no matter the size.  One of the first background materials we request from clients is their website address(es).  

Graphic of Update Save on Workers Comp Premiums Website

123RF

Why?  One of the first places that insurance carrier premium auditors examine for information about an employer is their website.  The auditor searches for certain areas in the webpages such as type of products produced; locations; Board of Directors, owners; company-specific or audit-specific  information.

If your website says that you manufacture widgets and your company has not produced those for many years, then your website should be updated with that information.  Your website can be thought of as a sales brochure.   Your website is not the place for out-of-date information.

Dollars and Coins Save on Workers Comp Premiums Cash

StockUnlimited

We came across an employer that was disputing their audit in California.  They produced ink dyes a few years ago, but then changed to manufacturing a type of sealant.   The auditor became confused when he/she looked at their website.   The result was being assessed a larger premium audit bill.

With our help, the situation was cleared up after it was discovered that their website even had a place to order the old ink dyes still active.

This happens more often when the website matches the company less and less each year.  One area to watch is that your Google profile links to an active but unlisted website.  Googling your company may show many links to a website you quit using long ago.

We actually switched blog sites in 2010.   Google still lists some of the old blog and website in their index from 2007.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Google, Premium Auditor Tagged With: background material, googling, owners information

Premium Audit Workpapers Can Save Future Headaches

October 21, 2014 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Premium Audit Workpapers Are Golden

The premium audit workpapers can be one of the easiest methods to document your yearly WC  premium audit.  The workpapers are prepared by the premium auditor. 

Picture of Premium Audit Workpapers Three Business Colleagues in Conference Meeting

123RF

They can be either hand-written or computerized, showing how the auditor arrived at the payroll numbers that are used to determine the audited premium.  

We always recommend that any employer asks for a copy of the workpapers before the premium auditor leaves your premises   Even if you agree with the audit, these documents can become very elusive as time passes.   


A large amount of confusion can be eliminated with the premium audit workpapers even if they are computerized or multiple Excel (R) worksheets.   The best workpapers are spreadsheets that are emailed by the auditor.  This allows you to analyze the premium audit without having to input all of the data. 

Picture Of Premium Audit Workpapers Document

Wikimedia Commons – Tom Ventura from Denver, CO, USA

Workpapers are the most often set of missing documents when our clients provide us with the requested information.   Asking for them at every premium audit conclusion may save you time, money, and headaches in the future. 

Audit checklists may also be beneficial.  The auditor will sometimes have a standard checklist they go through for every premium audit.  The checklist can be thought of as a map of your premium audit.   Many sets of audit workpapers are electronic.  In that case, you can ask for a copy of the electronic file such as the aforementioned spreadsheets.


You do have the right as the employer to be provided with a copy.  We have rarely seen where an auditor will not comply with the request for workpapers.  If an auditor refuses the request,  this should raise a red flag with you.  

An email to the premium auditor or the email address on the premium audit bill will work well to obtain your premium audit workpapers.  

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Audit Workpapers, Premium audit Tagged With: beneficial, checklist

China – Filing Work Comp Claim

October 9, 2014 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Filing A Compensation Claim In China Has Some Similarities

A Compensation claim of China filing workers. China has now overtaken us as the world’s largest economy.  China’s Workers Compensation system seems to be very complex.   The system on paper looks very straightforward.  There are five basic steps that are very similar to the US system:

5 star china Compensation Claim Flag On Map

(c) 123RF

  1. A claim is filed
  2. Diagnosis by an official health authority; 
  3. Verification by the local labor and social security authorities that the diagnosed injury/illness is actually work-related; 
  4. Assessment of the worker’s degree of disability as a result of the injury/illness; and
  5. Calculation by the social security authorities of the benefits to be paid. 

After researching the information more thoroughly, one would have to say the Chinese system is very similar in many aspects to the US. 

 The one major difference in China is the collusion of the medical providers and the employers.  It seems that corruption exists very heavily in this area.  The social security system is tasked with adjusting the WC claims.  There are no insurance carriers. 

 The four main compensable claim definitions are in some sense even more liberal than the US system. Definition #3 is sometimes denied by US carriers when the employee is on break. 

  1. The contraction of an illness as a direct result of the employee’s working conditions.
  2. Injuries suffered during work hours and within the workplace, when the worker is the victim of violence or suffers an unexpected injury whilst carrying out their duties. 
  3. Accidental injuries suffered before or after formal work hours and within workplace, due to activity considered preparation for work or conclusion of work. 
  4. Injuries suffered in an accident when the employee is on a business trip or assigned to work outside of the work place, including cases where the body cannot be found.
Graphic of china Compensation Claim Table

123RF

The main reasons for a claim denial are:

  1. Intoxication by alcohol or drugs
  2. Employee is knowingly committing a crime.
  3. The employee deliberately self-harms or commits suicide.
  4. Cases where an employee does not die within 48 hours of the onset of sudden illness while at work – interesting that the employee must die within 48 hours to collect benefits. 

There are corresponding grades for the severity of the disability due to injury.   The levels of disability are:  (by Grade) 

  • 1 to 4 indicate that the employee no longer has any ability to work; grades 
  • 5 and 6 signify that an employee has lost most of their ability to work 
  • 7 to 10 injuries are classified as partially disabled.

This is an example of a chart of benefits for an injured worker (click here) .  The specific grades are determined by a description of each grade.  

 I am sure there are off-paper differences between the Chinese and American Workers Compensation systems.  However, there are many striking similarities.  

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: China Tagged With: collusion, complex, health authority, intoxication, Social Security system

Florida Court Orders Advance On Workers Compensation Benefits

October 9, 2014 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Florida Court Orders Advance On TTD

I was reading an article recently that referred to a Florida Court case where  a Florida school system was ordered to pay a claimant  an advance on benefits.  For an adjuster to pay benefits in advance in usually verboten in most cases.The case was HATTIE BONNER,Appellant v. MIAMI DADE PUBLIC SCHOOLS.  This is one of the decisions that once again can harm a Workers Compensation system.  There have been other decisions of this type in Florida. The full decision is below.   Notice the dissent at the end.  I apologize ahead of time for the spacing.

Vector Badge of Florida Court Orders Advance

Wikimedia Commons – Florida Supreme Court

HATTIE BONNER,

Appellant,
v.
MIAMI DADE PUBLIC
SCHOOLS/GALLAGHER
BASSETT SERVICES, INC.,
Appellee.IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D14-1200
_____________________________/
Opinion filed October 7, 2014.
An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.
Ralph J. Humphries, Judge.
Date of Accident: April 9, 2012.
Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.
Michael J. Ring of the Law Office of Michael J. Ring, LLC, Pompano Beach, for
Appellee.PER CURIAM.In this workers’ compensation appeal, Claimant argues that the Judge of
Compensation Claims (JCC) erred in denying her request for a $2,000 advance. We
agree that the JCC erred in denying the advance.

Picture of Florida Court of Appeal

Wikipedia

Section 440.20(12), Florida Statutes (2011), permits advances of up to $2,000
on the following proof:(c) In the event the claimant has not returned to the same or
equivalent employment with no substantial reduction in wages or
has suffered a substantial loss of earning capacity or a physical
impairment, actual or apparent:
. . . .
2. An advance payment of compensation not in excess of
$2,000 may be ordered by any [JCC] . . . after giving due
consideration to the interests of the person entitled thereto.
The advance must, of course, “have some plausible nexus to” “medical and related
financial needs arising from workplace injuries.” ESIS/ACE Am. Ins. Co. v. Kuhn,
104 So. 3d 1111, 1114-15 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Here, the JCC concluded that “the
nexus between the accident and the circumstances suggesting the need for an
advance is missing” because Claimant’s “difficulty in managing those [financial]
circumstances is unrelated to her workplace injury.” Thus, the JCC has found that
Claimant has both a financial need and difficulty in managing her financial
circumstances. But from whence does that difficulty spring? Solely from
Claimant’s reduction in earnings, which – it is undisputed – is due to her workplace
injury.2  Claimant’s uncontroverted testimony was that she was off work for “more
than 18 months on sick leave,” that she returned to work at a reduction in total pay,
and that an advance “would put me up to date . . . so that I could put food in my
refrigerator, for one thing, gas in my car, and to pay my bills.” By this testimony,
which the JCC did not reject, Claimant has met her burden of proof.
The JCC’s conclusion that Claimant’s difficulty in managing her finances is
unrelated to her injury is seemingly based on his categorization of some of
Claimant’s monthly bills as “luxury expenses.” But whether an item is classified as
a “luxury” is not a proper factor for consideration under section 440.20(12)(c)2.
These small advances are merely a stopgap to help a claimant avoid defaulting with
creditors while awaiting the potential distribution of workers’ compensation
benefits, when the reduction in income is caused by the injury. A claimant is not
required to live a pauper’s life to be eligible for an advance of up to $2,000 under
section 440.20(12)(c)2.

Picture of Florida Court Gun Gesture Pointing Towards Legal Concept

StockUnlimited

Advances in excess of $2,000 are permitted under subsections 440.20(12)(c)3.
and (12)(d), and those subsections mandate that a JCC inquire into the
reasonableness of those larger advances. In contradistinction to advances over
$2,000, advances in a smaller amount do not permit this inquiry, but involve only a
consideration of the claimant’s interests; the burden of proof on the claimant is
lighter precisely because the financial burden on the employer or carrier is lighter.
3 As we made clear in Lopez v. Allied Aerofoam, 48 So. 3d 888, 889 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2010), “[s]ection 440.20(12)(c)2. requires the JCC to consider the ‘interests of
the person entitled [to the advance].’” We distinguish Worthy v. Jimmie Crowder
Excavating, 100 So. 3d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), on the ground that there the JCC
“was unable to adequately consider Claimant’s interests” without additional
evidence, which was Worthy’s burden to produce and prove, whereas here the JCC
found he had sufficient evidence to give Claimant’s interests due consideration.
Accordingly, we REVERSE the order denying the advance and REMAND
this matter for entry of an order awarding the requested $2,000 advance.
PADOVANO and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR; THOMAS, J., DISSENTS WITH
OPINION.

Building Of Florida Court Picture

Wikipedia – Brandonrush

4THOMAS, J., DISSENTS.
I dissent. This case presents nothing more than a failure of proof on
Claimant’s part, who bore the burden of persuasion. See Fitzgerald v. Osceola Cnty.
Sch. Bd., 974 So. 2d 1161, 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“Claimant bore the burden
over the course of the proceedings below to prove her entitlement to workers’
compensation benefits.”); Mitchell v. XO Commc’ns, 966 So. 2d 489, 490 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2007) (“Claimant has the burden to prove entitlement to . . . benefits. . . .
Accordingly, Claimant must present evidence the JCC finds persuasive.”). The JCC
found that Claimant’s “income and expenses roughly equate,” the record supports
that finding, and in the absence of any evidence of specific indebtedness connected
to the workers’ compensation case, the JCC properly denied the
advance. See Worthy v. Jimmie Crowder Excavating, 100 So. 3d 727, 728-29 (Fla.
1st DCA 2012) (noting claimant did not “provide any evidence to show that $2,000,
as opposed to something less than that, was appropriate in his situation”). Thus, I
respectfully dissent.
5

An order to advance workers compensation funds is highly unusual even in a Florida court. 

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Florida Tagged With: dissent, HATTIE BONNER

Will Cutting or Eliminating Health Insurance Cause Rise In WC Claims

October 7, 2014 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Cutting  Or Eliminating Health Insurance v. Workers Comp

One of  the under-the-radar effects of cutting or eliminating health insurance is a rise in Workers Compensation claims.  If an employee has no health insurance or has to pay a very large deductible, this may cause them to turn to Workers Comp as a way to pay for an accident that happened off the job.

Average of Eliminating Health Insurance WC Claims

Wikipedia – Farcaster

This is one of the assumptions that have been made in the WC arena for years.I came across a 2005 study that seems to fly in the face of this assumption.  Actually, I was researching to backup my assumption that employees will substitute WC for health insurance.  The Rand Study known was titled “How Does Health Insurance Affect Workers’ Compensation Filing?“The conclusion of  the 38 page working paper was:

  • Uninsured and more vulnerable workers are actually less likely to file claims than the insured.
  • The likelihood of filing WC claims has more to do with the employers’ characteristics and not the employees’  circumstances
  • Whether or not employers offer health insurance to employees appears most important, much more important even than the insurance status of workers themselves
  • Even repeat injury-sufferers are more likely to file during episodes in which their employer offers health insurance, but not statistically more likely to file during episodes in which they themselves are insured.
  • This suggests that the workplace environment and employer incentives may have a significant, or perhaps even the dominant, impact on workers’ compensation filing.
Cheerful Medical Personnel Eliminating Health Insurance Showing Hand Gesture

StockUnlimited

Some of the conclusions drawn in the study do make sense.   I also found another study from The Rand Corporation  titled The Impact of Health Care Reform on Workers’ Compensation Medical Care.  The author of the 2012 study used Massachusetts as his basis for drawing any conclusions as the state had been under healthcare reform previously.

The conclusion drawn was that healthcare reform caused some of the Workers Comp hospital bills to be paid under health.   This was due to a 5 – 10%  reduction in WC hospital volume since Massachusetts enacted healthcare reform.

The most recent study somewhat contradicts the previous study.   I am now confused as to whether or not health insurance reductions by employers will have an effect on WC.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: healthcare Tagged With: Rand, vulnerable

BLS Publishes Pilot Test Modified and Restricted Duty

October 2, 2014 By JL Risk Management Consultants

BLS Publishes Pilot Test – Full Of Good Info

The BLS publishes pilot test on Modified and restricted duty that is  full of great charts and data.

Picture of BLS Publishes Pilot Test and Co-pilot in Private Jet Cockpit

StockUnlimited

The BLS (Bureau of Labor and Statistics) has more labor statistics than any site on the web.  If you are a writer or presenter, the BLS is the go-to place for any type of out-of-work statistics.   The list of documents available is enormous.In April 2014, the BLS published a study known as Occupational Injuries and Illnesses: A pilot study of job-transfer or work-restriction cases, 2012.  

The summary page at the bottom the study shows one very interesting statistic.On page 35, the study has a chart which indicates that Food Manufacturers and Warehousing/Storage are the best in the study at returning injured workers to alternative jobs or modified duty.   The ability to return an injured worker to modified duty or an alternative job could also result from the type of   work involved with these specific employers.

The pilot study did not analyze all employers.   The BLS may do a full analysis in the future.  I will update this article when and if the BLS updates their study.  

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: BLS, Bureau of Labor Statistics Tagged With: modified duty, pilot test, restricted duty

E-Mod Increases Sharply – Top 5 Reasons May Help Reduce

October 1, 2014 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Sharp E-Mod Increases – Five Reasons

We have had many inquiries on employers’  E-Mod increases (X-Mod). Some have increased very significantly in just one year.  

Graphic of Number Five E-Mod Increases Reasons

StockUnlimited

Five reasons for the sharp E-Mod increases are:

  1. The E-Mod may have grown gradually without notice.   Checking back to see the E-Mods (X-Mods) over the prior five to seven years may show a pattern starting to develop that went unnoticed as there was no one big jump.
  2. Your company’s safety program is just not working properly.   This would be the reason for the largest number of sharp E-Mod increases.  The X-Mod system is specially designed to require larger premium payments from unsafe employers.   A large number of injuries in even one year can easily penalize an employer for being unsafe.   We have seen many employers eliminate or severely cut back their safety programs.  The old adage – “Pay it now or pay it later” is very true.
  3. Your company does not review your loss runs.  Online access to your claims can be golden in monitoring your current claims situation.   Many posts have been published in this blog regarding  reviewing loss runs and online claims access.   The loss runs can be seen as a map to find your way to what is occurring in your WC claims.
  4. Bar Graph E-Mod Increases With Hands Thumbs Up

    StockUnlimited

    Not following the Six Keys To Workers Comp Savings.  Use the search box in the upper right corner of the blog for the Six Keys.   It is worth your time.   I wrote the first four over 20 years ago.  They have not changed since my initial article in the ’80s.

  5.  Workers Comp is not the main priority – even in the insurance budgeting.   Over the past three years, the new health insurance regulations have become a higher priority until a massive Workers Comp audit bill is received from the carrier.   Once a large increase in an X-Mod or premiums is in place,  expert advice is usually the best method to reduce your WC budget.

This list is a small percentage of the reasons for a larger premium bill or X-Mod (E-Mod) increase.   Each WC situation has some unique aspects.  This list is the most common reasons that we see overall.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: E-Mod X-Mod Tagged With: priority, unique

Email Subscription

Search this website:

Work Comp Premium Audit Work Comp Mod Expert work comp expert witnessWork Comp Expert ReservesWork Comp Claim File Audit ExpertWork Comp Expert Witness

About Me

My Photo

James J Moore
Raleigh, NC, United States

James founded a Workers’ Compensation consulting firm, J&L Risk Mgmt Consultants, Inc. in 1996. J&L’s mission is to reduce our clients’ Workers Compensation premiums by using time-tested techniques. J&L’s claims, premium, reserve and Experience Mod reviews have saved employers over $9.8 million in earned premiums over the last three years. J&L has saved numerous companies from bankruptcy proceedings as a result of insurance overpayments.

James has over 27 years of experience in insurance claims, audit, and underwriting, specializing in Workers’ Compensation. He has supervised, and managed the administration of Workers’ Compensation claims, and underwriting in over 45 states. His professional experience includes being the Director of Risk Management for the North Carolina School Boards Association. He created a very successful Workers’ Compensation Injury Rehabilitation Unit for school personnel.

James’s educational background, which centered on computer technology, culminated in earning a Masters of Business Administration (MBA); an Associate in Claims designation (AIC); and an Associate in Risk Management designation (ARM). He is a Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC) and a licensed financial advisor. The NC Department of Insurance has certified him as an insurance instructor. He also possesses a Bachelors’ Degree in Actuarial Science.

LexisNexis has twice recognized his blog as one of the Top 25 Blogs on Workers’ Compensation. J&L has been listed in AM Best’s Preferred Providers Directory for Insurance Experts – Workers Compensation for over eight years. He recently won the prestigious Baucom Shine Lifetime Achievement Award for his volunteer contributions to the area of risk management and safety. James was recently named as an instructor for the prestigious Insurance Academy.

James is on the Board of Directors and Treasurer of the North Carolina Mid-State Safety Council. He has published two manuals on Workers’ Compensation and three different claims processing manuals. He has also written and has been quoted in numerous articles on reducing Workers’ Compensation costs for public and private employers. James publishes a weekly newsletter with 7,000 readers.

He currently possess press credentials and am invited to various national Workers Compensation conferences as a reporter.

James’s articles or interviews on Workers’ Compensation have appeared in the following publications or websites:
• Risk and Insurance Management Society (RIMS)
• Entrepreneur Magazine
• Bloomberg Business News
• WorkCompCentral.com
• Claims Magazine
• Risk & Insurance Magazine
• Insurance Journal
• Workers Compensation.com
• LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and other social media sites
• Various trade publications

 

Archives

  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

Recent Posts

  • Home Ergonomics Advice Reduces Workers Comp Costs
  • Workers Comp Predictive Analytics Changed Loss Run Reviews Forever
  • Workers Comp COVID-19 Vaccinations – Part of Return To Work
  • Workers Comp Test Audits – Pain or Preventative Measure
  • WCIRB 8871 Webinar – What California Insureds Need To Know
  • Workers Comp Website – 10 Things To Know When Switching Providers
  • Workers Comp Zoom Presentation – Top Four Hard Lessons Learned
  • Experience Mod Increases While Loss Runs Show No Changes – WTR?
  • Workers Comp Allocated Expenses – Who Pays For Which Bills?
  • Workers Compensation Presentations Kawasaki Technique
J&L Risk Management Consultants Inc
14460 Falls of Neuse Road,
Suite 149305
Raleigh, NC 27614
(800) 813-1386
▲Return to top of page
Copyright © 2021 J&L Risk Management Consultants, Inc.

Website Design by Redwood [ Design - Print - Web ]