• Home
    • Workers Comp Audit Stress Reducer – Use It For Your Next Premium Audit
  • About Us
    • Cutting Workers Comp Costs – About Our Company
    • President – Expert James J Moore AIC MBA ChFC ARM
    • OSHA Risk Manager – Glen DuLac – Added To Fulfill Customer Service
  • Work Comp Consultants
  • Free Info
    • Definitions
    • Free Speech
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Free Manuals
  • Six Secrets
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

J&L Risk Management Consultants

Work Comp expert witness reserve reviews premium audits for employers

icons
Call us today! 1-800-813-1386
WORKERS' COMPENSATION PREMIUM REFUNDS POSSIBLE.
Home » Archives for October 2009

Archives for October 2009

Workers Comp E-Mod X-Mod Forecast Errors By Expert

October 30, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

E-Mod X-Mod Forecasting Errors Due To Unit Stat Date 

Workers Comp E-Mod X-Mod calculating errors.Recently, I had come across some work from two so called Workers Comp “experts” that had guaranteed the accuracy of their E-Mod/X-Mod predictions for their client employers. I had thought this was interesting and decided to examine their predictions further.

Graphic Of Alert Icon E-Mod X-Mod Error

StockUnlimited

The one obvious error in calculating the E-Mods/X-Mods for the next year is that these were magically performed at the end of the prior policy year. This will just not work. There is a date called the Unit Stat date that is the deadline for the reserves on the applicable files to be applied to the  Experience Rating calculations.

The Unit Stat date is usually 6 months after the expiration of the last policy. To be entirely accurate, a consultant could as of today accurately calculate the future E-Mod/X-Mod for a policy that expired 5/1/09 to be applied to a policy that started on 5/1/10.

Why is the system set up that way? The six month delay is to enable the Workers Compensation adjusters to have time to assess accurate reserves on the files. The usually means to increase the files – rarely does it reflect many reductions. I am not for or against the Workers Comp Experience Rating System. It is the system we have in place.

One of the most frustrating situations occurs when the insurance carrier reports the claims data late.  The tardiness can wreak havoc when the rating bureau calculates the Experience Mod again and assigns a new one to an insured.  The employer may never see the recalculation coming.   

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: E-Mod X-Mod Tagged With: applicable files, wreak havoc

Workers Compensation Award Won Again By This Blog – Lexis Nexis

October 28, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Our Blog Won Another Workers Compensation Award From Lexis Nexis  

Our blog won another Workers Compensation award this week. This blog was recently named as one of the Top 25 Blogs on Workers Compensation for the 2nd year in a row by LexisNexis. We wish to say thank you to all of our blog and newsletter readers. J&L Risk Management Consultants and this blog could not have made the strides we have without you taking the time to read the postings. J&L and I have tried very hard to make this blog an easy quick read on a relevant topic. Once again – THANK YOU.

Graphic Of Trophy Blog Won Workers Compensation Award And Certificate

StockUnlimited

We recently also received Best’s Recognition for Expert Service Providers in Workers Compensation. That was also a great honor for us.  We are building a nice resource for Risk Managers, Adjusters, Attorneys, employers, and anyone else interested in Workers Compensation topics.  

According to LexisNexis J&L’s blog is “Well written and insightful, Cut Comp Costs Blog explains the nuts and bolts for how employers can reduce their premiums. If you’re an employer and want to connect the dots between politics and workers’ compensation and the impact on your premiums, Cut Comp Costs Blog is the place to start.”

Update – 2019 – blog readers now use this blog as a major resource source for information.  We now have well over 1,600 articles published to date.   Multiple organizations have awarded this blog for the technical information provided to the general public.   We are proud to announce that the J&L blog has won over 15 Workers Compenstion awards. 

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: LexisNexis Award Tagged With: Expert Service, technical information

Premium Audits – Paying Manufacturing Rates For Office Employee

October 25, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Can Premium Audits  = Manufacturing Rate For An Office Employee?

 When can premium audits generate manufacturing rates?   Two weeks ago, I posted on how two computer programmers could be rated as manufacturing employees at the year-end premium audit. Unfortunately, I did not complete the next posting on the subject. I will go ahead and do that now.

Clipart of man programmer premium audits Manufacturing Rates

(c) 123rf.com

Quite often, companies will make the honest mistake of having clerical employees end up in their highest rated classification. My prior example was of two computer programmers that had to cross through the manufacturing area in a plant to go on break. An insurance carrier in California during one of their premium audits charged the company the full rate for the manufacturing classification code and not the computer programmer code.

Was this proper?  If the employees were on break and not performing their job duties, can the break time actually be counted as work time for the premium audit?

Man Looking at Warehouse Premium Audits Blurry Background

StockUnlimited

No, it was not as the employees only went through the manufacturing area while on break. In CA, as other states, this would not cause the employees to be rated as manufacturing. The key here is they were on break at the time. If the employees had to cross through the manufacturing area for a job duty, then the premium auditor would have been correct to assign the manufacturing class code.

We see this situation occur on premium audits due to miscommunication between the auditor and the employer contact during the time of audit. How can this situation be avoided? I will post on that next time.

The California employer decided to dispute two of their premium audits due to the employee’s work centered being a programmer approximately 99.9% of the time.  The results of that dispute are still pending.   The word “break” makes the audit dispute valid to a point.   

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Premium audit Tagged With: clerical employees, computer programmer

Compsource In Oklahoma – Same Old Story Just Different State

October 22, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Compsource In Oklahoma

The carrier Compsource in Oklahoma may change to a private company. I have been traveling in Oklahoma over the last few days. One of the hot news items is that Compsource is looking to go private. Compsource is a quasi-governmental insurer of last resort for Workers Compensation for companies operating in only Oklahoma. They recently allowed companies with multi-state operations to be insured by Compsource.

Map Of Compsource In Oklahoma Graphic

StockUnlimited

As with SCIF in California, the sale of or conversion to a private company caused a great deal of confusion. For instance – are the employees of SCIF and Compsource actually state employees? SCIF in California was instructed to furlough employees, but a court decision said that could not be done with SCIF. Does the state actually have the right to sell off or convert the companies? There are many other states that are having to address these problems. It often seems that these quasi-governmental insurances are public or private as to which designation gives them the largest benefit. I cannot blame them as the governments look to wipe the slate clean, so to speak.

Removing Compsource as the insurer of last resort would be a mistake. The Workers Comp insurance rates in Oklahoma have long been stabilized by Compsource. The cost of business would increase dramatically if Compsource was disbanded, sold, or absorbed by another carrier. As I write this, I just read in the local newspaper that the whole Compsource mess is going to a hearing to have a judge rule on the future of Compsource.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: CompSource Oklahoma Tagged With: quasi-governmental insurances, Removing Compsource

Workers Compensation MSA Claims Monitoring – Threshold Key

October 20, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Monitoring Workers Compensation MSA Claims

I received a question about how to monitor workers compensation MSA claims for Workers Comp. Please check the last post for the definition of a Medical Set Aside or MSA claim. The best way to monitor the MSA – sometimes called WCMSA is to examine the thresholds.

Vector Graphic Of Hand Carrying Heart MSA Claims With HeartBeat

StockUnlimited

The thresholds are:

  • The claimant is currently a Medicare beneficiary and the total settlement amount is greater than $25,000; OR
  • The claimant has a “reasonable expectation” of Medicare enrollment within 30 months of the settlement date and the anticipated total settlement amount for future medical expenses and disability/lost wages over the life or duration of the settlement agreement is expected to be greater than $250,000.

Whether your company has a traditional Workers Comp insurance policy or is self insured makes no difference on the monitoring of a possible WCMSA claim.

The first bullet point above is clear. If the injured employee is a Medicare beneficiary and the total settlement is $25,000 or greater, then your company has to have the settlement approved by the CMS.

Stack Of US Currency MSA Claims Picture

123RF

The second bullet can be complicated. Our clients and companies that have contacted us have been confused about the term reasonable expectation that the employee will apply for Medicare within 30 months. The other area that is confusing is $250,000 level of future medical or lifetime medical.

The carrier or TPA is responsible to initiate the approval if they consider the claim to be a possible WCMSA. However the ultimate responsibility falls on the employer as is the case with most business insurance policies.

The simplest way is to request at policy renewal that all settlements of $25,000 or above have to be approved by you, the employer in writing. In fact, we advise most of our clients to make sure that all settlements of $10,000 or more have to be agreed to in writing by a designated person at the employer. Emails count as an approval.

This cuts down on any premium surprises at renewal and also allows the employer to be an additional checkpoint to make sure that the WCMSA Federal Laws have been satisfied.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: MSA WCMSA Tagged With: medical expense, medicare beneficiary, settlement date

WCMSA – Workers Compensation Claims Premiums Federalized 1980

October 17, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

WCMSA – How Workers Compensation Became Federalized 

The WCMSA rules by The Center For Medicare/Medicaid services (CMS  have been in place for years. 

I received a large number of questions on the subject of Workers Comp Medical Set Asides (MSA’s). The previous article on MSA’s was the most popular article since I started this blog. I thought I would cover them again and include some of the rules and regulations from the CMS. The blog readers have spoken. This is one to print and keep for your records.

Picture of medicare Claims and Premiums WCMSA Workers Comp

(c) 123rf.com

The US Department of Health and Human Services – Centers for Medicaid and Medicare (CMS) has issued a ruling many years ago. The ruling did and does not allow a Workers Compensation settlement to just dump all future benefit needs into the Social Security system to keep settlement values low. I will post more on this next time as this is a very long one to read – but it is critical to your Workers Compensation program. As they say – this is straight from the horse’s mouth.

All parties in a Workers’ Compensation (WC) case have significant responsibilities under the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) laws to protect Medicare’s interests when resolving WC cases that include future medical expenses. The recommended method to protect Medicare’s interests is a Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-aside Arrangement (WCMSA), which allocates a portion of the WC settlement for future medical expenses. The amount of the set aside is determined on a case-by-case basis and should be reviewed by CMS, when appropriate. Once the CMS determined set aside amount is exhausted and accurately accounted for to CMS, Medicare will agree to pay primary for future Medicare covered expenses related to the WC injury.

Settlements Entered Into Prior to the July 23, 2001 ARA Letter Concerning WC Commutation of Future Benefits

(Ref: 7/23/01 Memo)

Picture of Doctor Touch Cross Icon on Screen Claims and Premiums WC Commutation

(c) 123rf.com

The CMS will treat WC cases that were settled prior to the issuance of the July 23, 2001 ARA letter concerning WC Commutation of Future Benefits in the same manner as those settled after the review threshold guidelines were established. This will be done regardless of when the settlement actually occurred. However, a reopening of claims (see 42 C.F.R. 405.750 and 405.841) that Medicare previously denied for these individuals will not be granted, nor will the CMS change any decisions already made with respect to settlements which pre-date July 23, 2001.

Additional Information: When the CMS issued the July 23, 2001 ARA letter, it established review thresholds for WC cases settled by injured individuals who are not yet Medicare beneficiaries. This was done in order to organize and prioritize workloads for its Regional Offices (RO’s) and to convey to its ROs that it is not in Medicare’s best interests to review WC settlements that do not meet the review thresholds.

CMS Review Threshold

Female Doctor Claims and Premiums Writing In Patient Chart

StockUnimited

It is not in Medicare’s best interest to review every WC settlement nationwide in order to protect Medicare’s interests per 42 CFR 411.46. (Ref: 7/23/01 Memo Q1(c)) A WCMSA is not necessary when resolution of the WC claim leaves the medical aspects of the claim open.

A Worrkers Compensation Medicare/Medicaid Set Aside  (WCMSA) may be submitted to CMS for review in the following situations:

  • The claimant is currently a Medicare beneficiary and the total settlement amount is greater than $25,000; OR
  • The claimant has a “reasonable expectation” of Medicare enrollment within 30 months of the settlement date and the anticipated total settlement amount for future medical expenses and disability/lost wages over the life or duration of the settlement agreement is expected to be greater than $250,000.

Next up – How To Monitor Your MSA claims

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: CMS, MSA WCMSA Tagged With: future Medicare, Social Security system, threshold, WC settlement

Workers Compensation Medical Fee Schedules – Not In These States

October 15, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Workers Compensation Medical Fee Schedules

Workers Compensation medical fee schedules do cut comp costs.

Picture of stethoscope dollars and pills Workers Compensation Medical Fee Schedules Cost

(c) 123rf.com

After my last post, I received the question – Which states still do not have a fee schedule for their Workers Comp medical bills? After some research, I found out that there were now only five states left without a fee schedule. I did not delve into why they do not have one. I wanted to see if their medical bills were higher such as in the case of Tennessee before they enacted their modified fee schedule.

The five are:

  • Iowa – was actually lower than the neighboring states with fee schedules
  • Indiana – medical payouts were 33% higher than the median value.
  • Missouri – were actually lower than the neighboring states with fee schedules
  • New Hampshire – 73% of claim payouts were for medical, while neighboring states with fee schedules were at 49%.
  • New Jersey – data is very hard to find on NJ as they have their own rating bureau.
  • *Tennessee – even though they now have a fee schedule, their prior medical payouts were 36% higher than the median value.

This led me to research into whether these states have higher Workers Comp medical bill costs. What I found was that the states without a fee schedule were much more expensive than states with a fee schedule. Iowa and Missouri have both proved my theory as not completely accurate.

I could research the medical costs further, but for now I will just say that any state with runaway medical costs such as NH and IN should immediately enact fee schedules. As IA and MO have their medical costs under control, no fee schedule may be needed.  

2020 Update – Iowa and Missouri became expensive states.  Either state does not have a worker’s compensation medical fee schedule as of this year. 

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: fee schedule Tagged With: IN, NH

Tennessee Workers Comp Health Costs Controlled By Fee Schedule

October 13, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Tennessee Workers Comp Health Costs Lowered 

Fee schedules for Tennessee Workers Comp health Costs work reduced medical costs in the state without question. Most of the Workers Compensation data has shown that medical costs have been outpacing all other costs in Workers Comp claims. Medical costs are now approaching 60% of the total claim value in many states.

Vector Graphic Of Dollars Workers Comp Health Costs And Stethoscope

StockUnlimited

Many state governments have actually reduced Workers Comp medical costs by becoming more involved in the claim process. This is one instance of a program that is partially administered by state governments. I am referring to fee schedules.

Fee schedules are one of the most efficient and effective methods to reducing Workers Compensation costs. All states that have enacted fee schedules in the recent past have experienced a reduction in the medical costs per Workers Compensation claim.

I have yet to see any medical provider turn away patients as the result of a fee schedule being enacted.  Workers Compensation pays medical providers quite healthy fees for their services.  

I had recently read an article in the National Underwriter that the state of Tennessee had lowered their Workers Comp medical costs significantly by $1,300 per claim. Stop and think for one moment. What individual medical charges would have been reduced the most by a Workers Comp fee schedule in Tennessee?

The major fee reductions per types of services were as follows:

Outpatient

   Minor radiology – 15%

   Physical medicine – 12%

Inpatient

   Minor radiology – 43%

   Major radiology – 34%

   Physical Medicine – 23%

These are very stark numbers. The state of Tennessee is to be congratulated on their efforts to help cut workers comp costs. Their medical costs are now more in line with the rest of the states with fee schedules.

There are definitely ways that a state government can aid employers in reducing Workers Comp costs. This is a prime example.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: fee schedule Tagged With: healthy fees, inpatient, National Underwriter

Workers Compensation Crimes – Eight Important Definitions

October 10, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Eight Workers Compensation Crimes In Every State

The Workers Compensation crimes listed below denote serious violations.  Last week, I posted on J&L being referred to as a rebating company in a presentation at the annual ISO conference. We, of course, are not a rebating company. Rebating is highly illegal. I received questions on what other crimes are involved with Workers Comp. I decided to cover some of the crimes that involve Workers Compensation premiums.

Clipart of man chained wrecking ball Workers Compensation Crimes Rebating Company

(c) 123rf.com

Rebating – An agent or broker “rebates” part of his/her commission back to the employer to obtain the employer as a client

Twisting – A person shall not make any statement that is known, or should have been known, to be a misrepresentation

· to any other person for the purpose of inducing, or tending to induce, such other person either to take out a policy of insurance, or to refuse to accept a policy issued upon an application therefore and instead take out any policy in another insurer, or

· to a policyholder in any insurer for the purpose of inducing or tending to induce him or her to lapse, forfeit or surrender his or her insurance therein.

· A person shall not make any representation or comparison of insurers or policies to an insured which is misleading, for the purpose of inducing or tending to induce him or her to lapse, forfeit, change or surrender his or her insurance, whether on a temporary or permanent plan.

Churning – Refers to the excessive buying and selling of policies by your broker, for the purpose of generating commissions and without regard to your insurance objectives.

Clipart of lady holding money with building backgrounds Workers Compensation Crimes Highly illegal

(c) 123rf.com

Payroll Underreporting – An employer that intentionally does not report all payrolls to their insurance carrier or that pays wages in cash (under the table) to employees to subvert the Workers Comp premium process and the tax system. The IRS is cracking down very heavily on these employers.

Listing Employees as Subcontractors – An employer will list multiple employees as subcontractors as a method to avoid paying payroll taxes and workers compensation insurance. A quick test to see if the subcontractor is legitimate is by the subcontractor producing a certificate of insurance. The IRS has a list of very specific rules for the classifying between employees and subcontractors for taxing purposes.

Intentional Employee Misclassification – An employer intentionally lists an employee with a NCCI or state rating bureau classification code that results in a smaller premium for that employee.

Bid Rigging – Involves a conspiracy of brokers, advisers, TPA’s or insurance carriers to manipulate the market. There is a violation of antitrust and racketeering laws through a scheme that rigs bids for insurance policies and steering customers to certain carriers in return for payments or kickbacks.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Workers Comp Crimes Tagged With: churning, ISO, payroll underreporting, rebating, twisting

Being Named As Rebaters – Sign of Success?

October 7, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Named As Rebaters – J&L Risk Management at ISO Conference

J&L was recently named as rebaters at an ISO conference.I had heard many times of the saying “You know that you are successful when bad things are written about you.”  I am not sure of the saying’s source.

Graphic Of Man Sitting On Bar graph Named As Rebaters Holding Key

StockUnlimited

At a recent ISO national meeting, we were named as one of the 11 bad workers comp review companies that are basically spewing out untruths to make a profit. If I remember correctly, there were three premium auditors that worked on the presentation. They even had links to the “awful” websites/companies such as ours. I wonder if the ISO had thought to screen the presentations. The ISO is such a good organization to allow presentations such as this one.

They had a quote or two from the blog – of course without my permission – that said untoward things about the insurance companies. The comments of course were taken completely out of context. With almost 360 blog posts, taking a part of one sentence and holding it up to the light does not make much sense.

Graphic Named As Rebaters Check

123RF

The one thing that concerned me is that we were identified as rebaters. Rebaters used in this sense is a totally inaccurate term. Rebaters are agents or brokers that will refund back part of their commission to a client to be able to sell the client a policy. As all of our web pages point out at the bottom, we do not sell insurance. One has to wonder how accurate these auditor presenters are on their audits if they actually had professed that we were rebaters which is totally the wrong term. Rebating is an illegal act in the insurance world.

Please note that we are not rebaters in any way or form. We review Workers Compensation policies and reserves for statistical inaccuracies that may result in overcharges for employers. We do these reviews on a contingency or hourly basis. We also are expert witnesses on premium disputes. We often do performance file reviews for Self Insureds.

I wonder what the next inaccurate bad press will say about us? I hope they at least check the definitions of the words they are including in their articles.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Called Rebaters At ISO Conference Tagged With: auditor presenters, expert witnesses, spewing

Federal Government Heavily Involved in Workers Comp For Years

October 5, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Federal Government  and Workers Comp Insurance

I have posted often in the last few weeks in reference to how and why the Federal Government has been pushing to enter more regulations on Workers Compensation insurance including 24-hour healthcare coverage and a federal insurance office.

Graphic Of Insurance On Shield Federal Government Icon

StockUnlimited

I have not commented on how the Federal Government has affected almost all Workers Comp claims that have a settlement value of more than $25,000. A few years ago, the CMS (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services) issued a regulation that all Workers Compensation settlements of more than $25,000 have to be APPROVED by their offices. This caused an incredible logjam on getting cases finalized.

There are at least 10 major companies that have entrepreneured the business of assisting claims offices in getting the CMS to approve the Workers Compensation settlements. I have assisted no less than 15 investment companies in examining this market as a place to invest large amounts of cash. This is one of the hot ancillary service marketing areas in Workers Compensation today.

Calculator And Financial Bill Federal Government On Table

StockUnlimited

The rejection rate was supposedly calculated by the CMS at 28%. The CMS even issued a recent guide on how to get the Medicare Set Asides (MSA’s) approved by their offices. I do not fault the CMS for being more involved as quite often there is an interfacing of Social Security/Medicare benefits and Workers Comp settlements.

The main reason I posted on this situation is to let all my blog and newsletter readers that the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS ALREADY HEAVILY INVOLVED IN WORKERS COMP today. I have heard some of the Workers Comp pundits say that there is a long leap between the current Workers Comp system and a federalized one.

One does not have far to leap if one is already there.  CMS’s MSAs are the route into Workers Compensation currently taken by the Federal Government. 

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Work Comp Federalization Tagged With: entreprenuered, MSA

Senate Bill – Workers Compensation Could Be In Trouble

October 2, 2009 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Federalization Of Workers Comp Senate Bill

The Senate bill to Federalize insurance and Workers Comp appeared on the radar this week.

Painted Red of House of Court with Icons background Senate Bill Federalize Insurance

(c) 123rf.com

. Last week, I posted on 24 hour coverage and its negative effects on the Workers Compensation process. I had thought that bill would be the last we would hear of any federalization of Workers Comp and that the bill would not even make it to a vote. I was wrong as the following came across the wire yesterday evening.

The chairman of a key House subcommittee has released draft legislation that would establish a new Federal Insurance Office within the Treasury Department. Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., who chairs the House Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises, unveiled the Federal Insurance Office Act of 2009 on Thursday.

According to the draft language, the Federal Insurance Office (FIO)  would have the authority to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and assist the Treasury secretary in administering the federal terrorism insurance program.

USA Senate Bill Capitol Picture

Wikimedia Commons – Scrumshus

In addition, the new office would coordinate federal efforts and establish federal policy “on prudential aspects of international insurance matters” and determine whether the International Insurance Agreements on Prudential Matters pre–empt some state insurance measures. The document resembles earlier bills introduced by Rep. Kanjorski to set up a Federal Insurance Office within Treasury. The full committee is slated to hold a hearing Oct. 6 on the draft legislation and other regulatory reform draft bills.

With bills being introduced over and over again to federalize Workers Compensation and all insurance lines, the subject is just not going to drop. I suggest contacting your Senators and State Representatives as this legislation could harm the Workers Comp landscape that is handled very well on a state-level basis.

 

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Work Comp Federalization Tagged With: Insurance Agreements, legislation, State Representatives, Treasury Department

Email Subscription

Search this website:

Work Comp Premium Audit Work Comp Mod Expert work comp expert witnessWork Comp Expert ReservesWork Comp Claim File Audit ExpertWork Comp Expert Witness

About Me

My Photo

James J Moore
Raleigh, NC, United States

James founded a Workers’ Compensation consulting firm, J&L Risk Mgmt Consultants, Inc. in 1996. J&L’s mission is to reduce our clients’ Workers Compensation premiums by using time-tested techniques. J&L’s claims, premium, reserve and Experience Mod reviews have saved employers over $9.8 million in earned premiums over the last three years. J&L has saved numerous companies from bankruptcy proceedings as a result of insurance overpayments.

James has over 27 years of experience in insurance claims, audit, and underwriting, specializing in Workers’ Compensation. He has supervised, and managed the administration of Workers’ Compensation claims, and underwriting in over 45 states. His professional experience includes being the Director of Risk Management for the North Carolina School Boards Association. He created a very successful Workers’ Compensation Injury Rehabilitation Unit for school personnel.

James’s educational background, which centered on computer technology, culminated in earning a Masters of Business Administration (MBA); an Associate in Claims designation (AIC); and an Associate in Risk Management designation (ARM). He is a Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC) and a licensed financial advisor. The NC Department of Insurance has certified him as an insurance instructor. He also possesses a Bachelors’ Degree in Actuarial Science.

LexisNexis has twice recognized his blog as one of the Top 25 Blogs on Workers’ Compensation. J&L has been listed in AM Best’s Preferred Providers Directory for Insurance Experts – Workers Compensation for over eight years. He recently won the prestigious Baucom Shine Lifetime Achievement Award for his volunteer contributions to the area of risk management and safety. James was recently named as an instructor for the prestigious Insurance Academy.

James is on the Board of Directors and Treasurer of the North Carolina Mid-State Safety Council. He has published two manuals on Workers’ Compensation and three different claims processing manuals. He has also written and has been quoted in numerous articles on reducing Workers’ Compensation costs for public and private employers. James publishes a weekly newsletter with 7,000 readers.

He currently possess press credentials and am invited to various national Workers Compensation conferences as a reporter.

James’s articles or interviews on Workers’ Compensation have appeared in the following publications or websites:
• Risk and Insurance Management Society (RIMS)
• Entrepreneur Magazine
• Bloomberg Business News
• WorkCompCentral.com
• Claims Magazine
• Risk & Insurance Magazine
• Insurance Journal
• Workers Compensation.com
• LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and other social media sites
• Various trade publications

 

Archives

  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

Recent Posts

  • Home Ergonomics Advice Reduces Workers Comp Costs
  • Workers Comp Predictive Analytics Changed Loss Run Reviews Forever
  • Workers Comp COVID-19 Vaccinations – Part of Return To Work
  • Workers Comp Test Audits – Pain or Preventative Measure
  • WCIRB 8871 Webinar – What California Insureds Need To Know
  • Workers Comp Website – 10 Things To Know When Switching Providers
  • Workers Comp Zoom Presentation – Top Four Hard Lessons Learned
  • Experience Mod Increases While Loss Runs Show No Changes – WTR?
  • Workers Comp Allocated Expenses – Who Pays For Which Bills?
  • Workers Compensation Presentations Kawasaki Technique
J&L Risk Management Consultants Inc
14460 Falls of Neuse Road,
Suite 149305
Raleigh, NC 27614
(800) 813-1386
▲Return to top of page
Copyright © 2021 J&L Risk Management Consultants, Inc.

Website Design by Redwood [ Design - Print - Web ]