• Home
    • Workers Comp Audit Stress Reducer – Use It For Your Next Premium Audit
  • About Us
    • Cutting Workers Comp Costs – About Our Company
    • President – Expert James J Moore AIC MBA ChFC ARM
    • OSHA Risk Manager – Glen DuLac – Added To Fulfill Customer Service
  • Work Comp Consultants
  • Free Info
    • Definitions
    • Free Speech
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Free Manuals
  • Six Secrets
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

J&L Risk Management Consultants

Work Comp expert witness reserve reviews premium audits for employers

icons
Call us today! 1-800-813-1386
WORKERS' COMPENSATION PREMIUM REFUNDS POSSIBLE.
Home » Archives for June 2015

Archives for June 2015

Best Workers Comp Policy and Audit Review Tool

June 25, 2015 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Best Workers Comp Policy And Audit Tool Inexpensive

One of the best Workers Comp policy and audit review tools is not some type of overly expensive software or app.    The use of a highlighter and a print out of your complete Workers Comp policy will work wonders for examining your current Workers policy and subsequent premium audit.

Picture Of Hand Giving Policies Files Best Workers Comp Policy On Other Hand

(c) 123rf.com

If the access to your policy is online, then you can use the highlight button on your PDF or Word file.

I always recommend reading the whole policy as you will be surprised what is in there.    Making the effort to examine your policy is a great way to begin cutting your Workers Comp costs.

You can always just review the Dec Page (Declarations Page).   However, the Dec Page may only cover approximately 20% of your policy at the most.

When reviewing your policy, highlight anything you do not understand or any confusing clauses.   These will need to be covered with your agent or consultant BEFORE you sign off on the policy or agree to finalize any premium audit results.    This is no way means there may be something wrong with your policy or audit.

However, if you are going to sign off what you will have to live with for the next year, it may be in your best interest to bring up questions and concerns as soon as possible.   Waiting until after the policy audit results are mailed to your company is not necessarily too late.   The longer you wait, the more difficult it becomes to review any questions that you may have had in the past.

Picture Of Hand Gesture Best Workers Comp Policy With Audit Concept

StockUnlimited

When our clients contact us about performing a review of their premium audits, we often hear that there were questions when the policy was quoted or issued.   Your agent should be and usually will be happy to answer any of your questions.   That is part of his/her/their services to earn their commissions they charge for quoting and binding your policy.

The longer an employer waits to question anything on a policy oar premium audit, the more leverage is lost if there is a dispute.   If you are reading this and have questions or either your WC policies or premium audits, there are tens if not hundreds of answers in this blog.

The bottom line is the best the best workers comp policy and audit and review tool is the attention that you or your staff is giving to your insurance program by just paying attention to what is occurring in your policies and audits.

If you still have questions, feel free to drop us a note on our contact page or at [email protected]

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Declaration Page Tagged With: confusing clauses, highlighter, leverage, PDF

Workers Comp Classification Codes – How Do We Verify Them?

June 24, 2015 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Workers Comp Classification Codes

This question on Workers Comp Classification Codes was phoned into our offices last week due to the prior post on Classification Codes.   One of the blog readers asked where to find the manual or website that contains all of the Workers Comp Class Codes.

Picture Of Folder and Magnifying Glass Workers Comp Classification Codes Concept

StockUnlimited

The employer had received a workers comp audit and subsequent billing recently.  The employer did not notice they had new classification codes on their policy and at time of audit.

The one main determinant is what states or states are covered by the policy.  There are many independent rating bureaus that have their own classification codes manual such as California or Ohio.

The NCCI out of Boca Raton, FL covers most of the individual states and covers virtually all of the interstate (multistate) ratings including classification codes.

The Scopes Manual is produced by NCCI.   This is the manual which contains all of the workers comp classification codes.   However, referencing the manual and attempting any type of dispute comes with a Goliath caveat.

We receive a large number of emails and calls from employers that have decided to DIY on this subject.   The employer has often referenced some type of classification manual and disputed the classification codes.

The carrier accepted the codes which actually increased their earned premium over what was contained in the audit billing.

Woman Audit Bill Workers Comp Classification Codes Using Calculator

StockUnlimited

One has to also be very careful when attempting to switch class codes if your company has a very high Mod (E-Mod or X-Mod).   This is one of the most frequent ways to actually end up paying more premium.

If your company has a high Mod and then changes workers comp class codes to less risky ones, your Mod may increase enough to offset any type of refund that you would be owed and even result in a higher bill.

We usually receive the phone call after the Classification  Codes have been reassigned and the Mod has spiked.   There is not much we can do at that point.

Recalculating (re-promulgating) the Mod should be part of the dispute process.

The increased Mod is the result of the intricacies of the rating and Mod formulas.    For the most part,  Mods and class codes have an inverse relationship of sorts.

There are many articles in this blog concerning the premium dispute process.  Feel free to use them to aid your company in researching the workers comp class codes.

This post was not meant to discourage any employer that has questions on their policy and audit to find out the correct answers or to dispute any audit.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

 

Filed Under: classification code Tagged With: Goliath caveat, intricacies, re-promulgating, subsequent

Meth vs Opioids in Workers Comp – Hidden Epidemic?

June 23, 2015 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Meth vs Opioids in Workers Comp

Meth vs Opioids in Workers Comp – the silent epidemic is occurring and we may not be looking at what should be considered an even more dangerous line of drugs than opioids.

Picture of Crystal Meth vs Opioids Silent Epidemic

123RF

Opioids are one of the most discussed topics in any analytical setting on Workers Compensation.  I had begun to refer to a great article on opioids when an old friend of mine had informed me that she was getting married to one of my high school classmates.

I brought up the fact that I was writing an article on opioids as we talked.  She is a special education teacher in Dallas, Texas.  She informed that in Texas, Oklahoma,  and most of the rural Southwest opioids pale in comparison to meth and especially a form of it called ice – the smokable meth.

How would she know this – a large % of the special education students she teaches are actually due to the use of crack cocaine and meth by their parents.   Dallas is not a bad city.  In fact, due to the recent oil boom it is one of the most prosperous cities in the nation.

Picture of Meth vs Opioids Mouth Bite

123RF

I do not possess a large amount of facts or figures but Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Arkansas, and other Southwestern states are suffering greatly.   As we all know – as society goes, so does Workers Comp.   Meth is much cheaper and actually more accessible than opioids.

One concern is that I do have statistics on opioids, but are there statistics on meth in Workers Comp?  There are studies on most drugs, and unless I am mistaken, little to none on meth.  I must digress to a great article on Workers Comp and opioids.

The article was written by Peter Rousmaniere (in cooperation with WorkCompCentral and CompPharma)  We’re Beating Back Opioids – Now What?   Please note that it is a PDF download.   Peter has performed quite a good bit of research.   I am going to allow myself to take a few liberties and post some of the quotes from the report.

Please note that the PDF is now part of a webinar on opioids.  The PDF is not available. 

Over half of persons receiving 90 days of continuous opioid therapy remain on opioids years later.   This is almost unbelievable.

The nation’s first reported death from prescribed opioids was that of an injured worker, a beneficiary of the Washington Department of Labor and Industries.   This is not surprising. 

In the meth vs opioids in workers comp debate,  one has to look at the future to see that another illicit drug may take the place of opioids for addiction.  I do not think the new replacement drug will be marijuana.

I think the answer to the Now What? part of the aforementioned study is a new illegal drug may be the next “what.”

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Opioid Tagged With: aforementioned, epidemic, illicit, meth, smokable

Classification Codes – Employee Misclassification Different

June 18, 2015 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Employee Misclassification Different

North Carolina Will Likely Soon Enact Employee Misclassification Bill

Classification codes are not the same as what North Carolina is looking to reign in concerning unscrupulous employers. We begin to receive questions when the subject of employee misclassification hits the Workers Comp newswires.

Hand holding Magnifying Glass Search Employee classification codes Graphic

StockUnlimited

North Carolina will very likely enact a law on employee misclassification. However, this does not mean that a company cannot question or dispute the classification codes on their policy, premium audit, or bill.

There are over 100 articles on this blog that reference how to question or dispute your Workers Comp premium audit and subsequent billings.

The misclassification referred to in this case is classifying employees as subcontractors or employees. North Carolina has had a recent history of allowing 30,000+ companies to not have WC insurance or classifying all employees as subcontractors.

Employee Holding Classification Codes Magnifying Glass

StockUnlimited

This caused quite a stink when an employee had a claim but was then denied benefits as they were non-insured subcontractors.   One has to wonder how many North Carolina companies still have no WC coverage.

We would have never found out about the 30,000+ uninsured companies if a dutiful newspaper reporter simply compared a few databases that were publicly available.

Even classifying contractors properly is now and will still be permitted even after the upcoming law likely comes into effect this summer. The IRS guidelines provide an overall rule of thumb, but are not state-specific.

Workers compensation classification codes are usually settled at premium audit time. However, adding new classification codes at audit is one of the Ten Red Flags of Workers Comp Policies and Audits.

There is a caveat here. One has to be careful when preparing for a premium audit.  This South Carolina company was prosecuted along with an “audit preparation consultant“ for misrepresenting employee classifications to their WC carrier before the premium audit.

If this seems confusing drop me an email or call me.  The bottom line is whatever law North Carolina or any other state enacts does not preclude your company from questioning or disputing your Workers Comp policies, audits, or billings. That is just good business sense as you should pay every penny you owe in Workers Comp, but not one cent extra.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Misclassifying Employees Tagged With: dutiful, newswires, unscrupulous

US Supreme Court ACA Decision To Affect Workers Comp?

June 17, 2015 By JL Risk Management Consultants

US Supreme Court ACA Decision Could Affect Workers Comp

The US Supreme Court ACA decision could easily affect Workers Comp.  Let us call it the old Law of Unintended Consequences.

Badge Of US Supreme Court ACA Blue Backgroud

(c) 123rf.com

There are multiple articles on this blog concerning the Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare) and its possible effect on WC.

For reference some of the articles are:

  • Oklahoma’s Workers Comp Opt Out Program May Be Trumped By Obamacare
  • Five Ways ObamaCare and Workers Comp Are Similar
  • Obamacare And Its Effect On Workers Compensation

Would the Workers Compensation industry actually see a spike in claims if the Supreme Court guts the ACA?   My answer would be an unequivocal – Yes.

I have always felt since working my way through the WC claims hierarchy that people are going to look under every stone to find some type of insurance coverage.

A possible scenario in this case would be that all of a sudden someone cannot renew their ACA-sponsored policy.  Who could blame that person for attempting to file a WC claim to receive treatment for an injury that was originally treated under a health insurance policy?  Desperate people do desperate things.

This is not to say these types of claims would ever be accepted by a WC claims department.  However, if the claim is reported, the requirement of a full investigation will still use up a large amount of time for a claims department.

Affordable Care Act US Supreme Court ACA Logo

Wikimedia Commons – Careilly5801

The states and the Feds have all said they will bring in measures to keep health insurance alive for ACA policies.

However,  would there not likely be a haircut of people covered as the health insurance carriers would only have to look at the Law of Large Numbers to see that a smaller group of health plan participants would prevent the risk being spread among a large enough group.

I am not advocating for or against the ACA.  Numbers do not lie, unless you look at the wrong numbers.

One only has to look to the opinion proffered by Dr. Richard Victor- the outgoing Director of WCRI.  He presented a very interesting slant on how WC and the Affordable Healthcare Act would collide with each other.

The US Supreme Court ACA decision is likely days or weeks away.  In the words of Bananarama, it could be a “Cruel, Cruel Summer” if you work in a WC claims department.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Obamacare Tagged With: Bananarama, Consequences, hierarchy, US Supreme Court

Work Comp Virtual Doctor Visits – Are You On Board?

June 11, 2015 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Work Comp Virtual Doctor Visits

The idea of Work Comp Virtual Doctor Visits have been met with many different reactions.   My last article on virtual doctor visits was met with either complete skepticism or acceptance.

Picture of Doctor work comp virtual doctor visits on cam

(c) 123rf

A very interesting article in WebMD on virtual physician visits caught my attention.  It was not the subject matter that piqued my interest.  The mega-corporations are now pushing for these visits- among them:

  • Walgreen’s Pharmacies
  • United Health Group
  • Blue Cross Blue Shield – Anthem.

In fact the astounding claim by the two health insurers are:

“Walgreens said Wednesday that it will offer a smartphone application that links doctor and patients virtually in 25 states by the end of the year. That growth comes as UnitedHealth Group and the Blue Cross-Blue Shield insurer Anthem prepare to make their own non-emergency telemedicine services available to about 40 million more people by next year.”

Forty million is a large number of patients covered by virtual physician visits.  The other astounding number is 25 state coverage.

The Workers Comp industry can no longer ignore or mistrust this area of medicine that is becoming cutting edge.  Smartphone apps are going to be the crux of this medical revolution- even in the WC industry.

One area of skepticism that would naturally occur is the trust of the WC carrier on the results of a virtual doctor visit.  If you will follow the link to the article, you will find a partial solution.

Some states have limited telemedicine:

Telemedicine Work Comp Virtual Doctor Visits On Computer

Wikimedia Commons – Intel Free Press

Some regulators prevent a doctor from using a telemedicine visit to write prescriptions for controlled substances or abortion-inducing medicines. Some states also require a doctor to have an established relationship with a patient, which might include a physical or mental exam, before allowing them to do a telemedicine visit.

I think that physicians would have to screen their patients involving Work Comp virtual doctor visits with concerns such as:

  • Possible malingerer
  • Opioid concerns
  • Severity of injury

Would you let your WC claimant have a virtual visit?   We all have to remember that many of the files will have a rehabilitation nurse assigned that could easily facilitate Work Comp virtual doctor visits.

I do recommend checking out the second link in this article for the AP article to which I am referring for reference.   There are even more astounding numbers in the article that pertain to the near future- totally amazing.

Work Comp virtual doctor visits may be so commonplace someday that the in-person visits will seem out of date.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: telemedicine Tagged With: astounding, facilitate, virtual doctor, WebMD

Human Resources and Safety

June 10, 2015 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Human Resources and Safety

So what is the big deal about Human Resources ?   One may ask, “ you said you were going to address safety, yet you start with some Human Resources articles, why ? “   Simple, because good Human Resources is the platform for smart safety.  Think of it like a triangle, the base of the triangle is Human Resources, the next side is safety and the final side to our Risk Management Triangle is Workers’ Comp. administration.

by Glen DuLac, Safety Consultant

Picture Of Human Resources Sitting and Talking Outdoors

StockUnlimited

Several years ago, while working as a Regional Risk Manager, for a large staffing company, my V.P. made  the following statement;  “  We hire our own work comp claims.”   This simple concept had a profound influence on my professional career.

At the time I had one last class to finish, the CPCU designation, with that completed, I decided to become certified in Human Resources, so I passed the PHR exam.   A number of years later,  I finished a graduate degree in Human Resources.

Controlled studies have proven that good employees will have fewer injuries and fewer claims.  And of greater importance for Senior Managers, is that these employees are more productive.  Greater productivity becomes greater profits.  It has been shown that workers who score high on conscientiousness have only half of the injuries as employees with low scores on conscientiousness.

Graphic of Human Resources Connecting Icon People

123RF

Here are four steps to a stellar safety program.  Here is a mnemonic device for remembering the four, STIR.  This stands for the following:  Science, Training, IIPP and Recognition or rewards.  First we use the available science for all employee selection.  There are a number of reliable personality tests for selecting employees, but the best will focus on conscientiousness and or honesty.  Use science, not interviews.

Next, it is vitally important to have a bullet proof Injury and Illness Prevention Plan ( IIPP) .  Many companies have poorly crafted IIPPs.  Or they had a good plan but their operation has changed but the plan was never updated.  In many states, an IIPP  that is deficient,  is OSHA’s most common employer violation.   An important subpart of the IIPP is employee safety training.  Lack of regular safety training is another common violation.

Picture Of Human Resources Training Of Employee On Computer

StockUnlimited

One safety training annually is an accident waiting to happen.  Safety training that is regular and hazard specific will reduce accidents and save money in several different ways.  Also, you must have written records of the training.  Finally, rewards and or recognition help reinforce the safety culture.  There are dozens of ways to approach rewards and recognition plans, for brevity,  I will only suggest one.

Make safety part of the employees annual review process. No employee with a poor safety record shall be promoted or receive raises or bonuses.  It is good business to reward the behaviors that management wants, and not to reward behaviors that are undesirable.

In closing, there are companies with good safety records that do not integrate safety and human resources, but if you want a superlative safety program and a distinct competitive advantage, which can translate into greater profits, it will only happen by using the science which is found in Human Resources.

SOME Initials

CPCU,  Charter Property and Casualty Underwriter  ( a Risk Management and Insurance credential )

PHR,    Professional in Human Resources

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

 

Filed Under: Safety Tagged With: bonuses, IIPP, PHR, STIR, undesirable, V.P

WALSH Jurisdiction Test – North Carolina Court Of Appeals

June 9, 2015 By JL Risk Management Consultants

North Carolina Court of Appeals and the WALSH Jurisdiction Test

The WALSH Jurisdiction Test for Workers Compensation has always seemed to work when multi-jurisdictions (states) are involved in a claim.  One of the most recent cases concerning the WALSH Jurisdictional test occurred in North Carolina at the appellate level.

Picture of Gavel WALSH Jurisdiction Test Court of Appeals

StockUnlimited

If you are not familiar with the WALSH test, click on the link to find out more.  The test is basically: Worked, Accident, Lived, Salaried, and Hired.  By using the first letter of each of these considerations, the name WALSH is noted.

The case  Taylor v. Howard Transportation is one of those very difficult claims where a truck driver can have many states’ jurisdictions involved in making the final determination.

The following is a passage from the North Carolina appeals court decision.

B. Analysis

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-36 provides:

Where an accident happens while the employee is employed elsewhere than in this State (Salaried) and the accident is one which would entitle him or his dependents or next of kin to compensation if it had happened in this State (Accident), then the employee or his dependents or next of kin shall be entitled to compensation

Hand Pointing WALSH Jurisdiction Test Salary Graph

StockUnlimited

(i) if the contract of employment was made in this State,  (Hired)

(ii) if the employer’s principal place of business is in this State(Salaried), or

(iii) if the employee’s principal place of employment is within this State[.] N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-36 (2013). (Worked)

Neither HT’s principal place of business nor plaintiff’s principal place of employment was in North Carolina. Thus, in order for the Commission to have subject-matter jurisdiction, plaintiff’s contract of employment (Hired) must have been made in North Carolina. See id.

“To determine where a contract for employment was made, the Commission and the courts of this state apply the ‘last act’ test. For a contract to be made in North Carolina, the final act necessary  to make it a binding obligation must be done here.” 

As one can see the WALSH jurisdiction test was applied by the Court in a roundabout method.   The WALSH test is difficult to apply with truckers.  They cover so many states in their travels and may be hired out of a distant terminal North Carolina jurisdiction was denied in this case by the NC Court of Appeals.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: WALSH WC Jurisdiction Choice Tagged With: binding obligation, plaintiffs, salaries

Large Deductible Mods Do Exist

June 3, 2015 By JL Risk Management Consultants

Large Deductible Mods

Large Deductible Mods do exist even if you have been told otherwise.  Your company may have been informed that once you have a large deductible policy in place, E-Mods are a thing of the past.

Your company is still in the E-Mod system.

Picture of Large Deductible Mods Stethoscope and Calculator

123RF

This is one of those misunderstandings that seem to pervade Workers Comp.

Unfortunately your company’s losses were reported to the rating bureaus (NCCI, WCIRB, etc.) and you do have a Mod in most cases.

Of course being self insured would usually preclude your company from having a Mod.  However, you are not a self insured if you have a large deductible policy.

A large deductible policy is differentiated from a small deductible due to the level of the deductible.  Most rating bureaus including NCCI  consider any employer with a $100,000 deductible or larger as a large deductible employer.

Man Hand Holding Butterfly Net Large Deductible Mods Catching Flying Money

StockUnlimited

Large deductible Mods will be calculated by using the loss data that is reported to the rating bureau on your Unit Stat Date similar to other WC policies.

Even though I have written on this subject often, this is one area where misunderstandings crop up- especially if a company decides to not insure under a large-deductible plan at renewal.

The former large deductible company is then presented with an E-Mod they never even realized was in place.

One of the better studies on Worker Comp Large deductibles is 2006 National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) report on large deductible arrangements.   The definitions alone are worth a read.

I have written often on Large Deductible E-Mods in the past. Some of the articles are:

X-Mod (EMod) Surprise

Premium Audits For Large Deductibles

WC Large Deductibles And The Rating Bureaus

Please note that I am writing on a limited point in what can be a complex issue.   Many large deductible plans are custom-built for employers.  However, the loss reporting requirement of the rating bureaus still applies to these policies.

©J&L Risk Management Inc Copyright Notice

Filed Under: Large Deductible Tagged With: custom-built, misunderstandings, not insure, preclude

Email Subscription

Search this website:

Work Comp Premium Audit Work Comp Mod Expert work comp expert witnessWork Comp Expert ReservesWork Comp Claim File Audit ExpertWork Comp Expert Witness

About Me

My Photo

James J Moore
Raleigh, NC, United States

James founded a Workers’ Compensation consulting firm, J&L Risk Mgmt Consultants, Inc. in 1996. J&L’s mission is to reduce our clients’ Workers Compensation premiums by using time-tested techniques. J&L’s claims, premium, reserve and Experience Mod reviews have saved employers over $9.8 million in earned premiums over the last three years. J&L has saved numerous companies from bankruptcy proceedings as a result of insurance overpayments.

James has over 27 years of experience in insurance claims, audit, and underwriting, specializing in Workers’ Compensation. He has supervised, and managed the administration of Workers’ Compensation claims, and underwriting in over 45 states. His professional experience includes being the Director of Risk Management for the North Carolina School Boards Association. He created a very successful Workers’ Compensation Injury Rehabilitation Unit for school personnel.

James’s educational background, which centered on computer technology, culminated in earning a Masters of Business Administration (MBA); an Associate in Claims designation (AIC); and an Associate in Risk Management designation (ARM). He is a Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC) and a licensed financial advisor. The NC Department of Insurance has certified him as an insurance instructor. He also possesses a Bachelors’ Degree in Actuarial Science.

LexisNexis has twice recognized his blog as one of the Top 25 Blogs on Workers’ Compensation. J&L has been listed in AM Best’s Preferred Providers Directory for Insurance Experts – Workers Compensation for over eight years. He recently won the prestigious Baucom Shine Lifetime Achievement Award for his volunteer contributions to the area of risk management and safety. James was recently named as an instructor for the prestigious Insurance Academy.

James is on the Board of Directors and Treasurer of the North Carolina Mid-State Safety Council. He has published two manuals on Workers’ Compensation and three different claims processing manuals. He has also written and has been quoted in numerous articles on reducing Workers’ Compensation costs for public and private employers. James publishes a weekly newsletter with 7,000 readers.

He currently possess press credentials and am invited to various national Workers Compensation conferences as a reporter.

James’s articles or interviews on Workers’ Compensation have appeared in the following publications or websites:
• Risk and Insurance Management Society (RIMS)
• Entrepreneur Magazine
• Bloomberg Business News
• WorkCompCentral.com
• Claims Magazine
• Risk & Insurance Magazine
• Insurance Journal
• Workers Compensation.com
• LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and other social media sites
• Various trade publications

 

Archives

  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

Recent Posts

  • Home Ergonomics Advice Reduces Workers Comp Costs
  • Workers Comp Predictive Analytics Changed Loss Run Reviews Forever
  • Workers Comp COVID-19 Vaccinations – Part of Return To Work
  • Workers Comp Test Audits – Pain or Preventative Measure
  • WCIRB 8871 Webinar – What California Insureds Need To Know
  • Workers Comp Website – 10 Things To Know When Switching Providers
  • Workers Comp Zoom Presentation – Top Four Hard Lessons Learned
  • Experience Mod Increases While Loss Runs Show No Changes – WTR?
  • Workers Comp Allocated Expenses – Who Pays For Which Bills?
  • Workers Compensation Presentations Kawasaki Technique
J&L Risk Management Consultants Inc
14460 Falls of Neuse Road,
Suite 149305
Raleigh, NC 27614
(800) 813-1386
▲Return to top of page
Copyright © 2021 J&L Risk Management Consultants, Inc.

Website Design by Redwood [ Design - Print - Web ]